cheapjue said...
Say hi to Ian for me. Gram.
The above was left in the comment section after my last post.
The question is??? What is the point? Did this person get mad at having to look up parsimonious? And even if He/she had to look it up, what is the point of this comment? It's a joke you moron. ( I guess the JOS didn't see the free part)
Is this some kind of veiled threat? The antisemitism isn't lost on me either. This is as chicken shit as it gets. using a beloved grandchild's name against a poor, old, disabled, woman. (cranky, but old, and disabled) What's next? ya gonna feed my little dog antifreeze? Poison the cat's food?
I know that I said I wouldn't go there again, but the JOS just can't give it up. The JOS are like a pit bull with a grudge and should be put down. They are not fit to run about unmuzzled. The comment above is what I meant by beating a dead horse to a bloody pulp.
GET OVER IT! IT'S DEAD AND STINKING. MAYBE SPEND ALL THE FREE TIME, YOU SEEM TO HAVE ON YOUR HANDS, BY DOING A REWRITE. TAKE OUT THE FLAWS, MAKE IT REAL AND TRY AGAIN AFTER YA GET ALL THE BUGS OUT! (Ya might even ask the folks who told ya so.... where the changes need to be made.)
You must again understand that all this garbage says more about you than it does about me!
OH, and you may want to look at this too... It has to do with computer stalking. SEC. 114. CRIMINAL PROVISION RELATING TO STALKING.
8 (a) INTERSTATE STALKING.—Section 2261A of title
9 18, United States Code, is amended to read as follows:
10 ‘‘§ 2261A. Stalking
11 ‘‘Whoever—12 ‘‘(1) travels in interstate or foreign commerce
13 or within the special maritime and territorial juris
14 diction of the United States, or enters or leaves In
15 dian country, with the intent to kill, injure, harass,
16 place under surveillance, or intimidate another per
17 son, and in the course of, or as a result of, such
18 travel places that person in reasonable fear of the
19 death of, or serious bodily injury to, or causes sub
20 stantial emotional distress to that person, a member
21 of the immediate family (as defined in section 115)
22 of that person, or the spouse or intimate partner of
23 that person; or
24 ‘‘(2) with the intent—†
58
S 1197 ES
1 ‘‘(A) to kill, injure, harass, place under
2 surveillance, intimidate, or cause substantial
3 emotional distress to a person in another State
4 or tribal jurisdiction or within the special mari
5 time and territorial jurisdiction of the United
6 States; or
7 ‘‘(B) to place a person in another State or
8 tribal jurisdiction, or within the special mari
9 time and territorial jurisdiction of the United
10 States, in reasonable fear of the death of, or se
11 rious bodily injury to—
12 ‘‘(i) that person;
13 ‘‘(ii) a member of the immediate fam
14 ily (as defined in section 115 of that per
15 son; or
16 ‘‘(iii) a spouse or intimate partner of
17 that person;
18 uses the mail or any facility of interstate or foreign
19 commerce to engage in a course of conduct that
20 causes substantial emotional distress to that person
21 or places that person in reasonable fear of the death
22 of, or serious bodily injury to, any of the persons de
23 scribed in clauses (i) through (iii) of subparagraph
24 (B);
†
59
S 1197 ES
1 shall be punished as provided in section 2261(b) of this
2 title.’’.
Say hi to Ian for me. Gram.
The above was left in the comment section after my last post.
The question is??? What is the point? Did this person get mad at having to look up parsimonious? And even if He/she had to look it up, what is the point of this comment? It's a joke you moron. ( I guess the JOS didn't see the free part)
Is this some kind of veiled threat? The antisemitism isn't lost on me either. This is as chicken shit as it gets. using a beloved grandchild's name against a poor, old, disabled, woman. (cranky, but old, and disabled) What's next? ya gonna feed my little dog antifreeze? Poison the cat's food?
I know that I said I wouldn't go there again, but the JOS just can't give it up. The JOS are like a pit bull with a grudge and should be put down. They are not fit to run about unmuzzled. The comment above is what I meant by beating a dead horse to a bloody pulp.
GET OVER IT! IT'S DEAD AND STINKING. MAYBE SPEND ALL THE FREE TIME, YOU SEEM TO HAVE ON YOUR HANDS, BY DOING A REWRITE. TAKE OUT THE FLAWS, MAKE IT REAL AND TRY AGAIN AFTER YA GET ALL THE BUGS OUT! (Ya might even ask the folks who told ya so.... where the changes need to be made.)
You must again understand that all this garbage says more about you than it does about me!
OH, and you may want to look at this too... It has to do with computer stalking. SEC. 114. CRIMINAL PROVISION RELATING TO STALKING.
8 (a) INTERSTATE STALKING.—Section 2261A of title
9 18, United States Code, is amended to read as follows:
10 ‘‘§ 2261A. Stalking
11 ‘‘Whoever—12 ‘‘(1) travels in interstate or foreign commerce
13 or within the special maritime and territorial juris
14 diction of the United States, or enters or leaves In
15 dian country, with the intent to kill, injure, harass,
16 place under surveillance, or intimidate another per
17 son, and in the course of, or as a result of, such
18 travel places that person in reasonable fear of the
19 death of, or serious bodily injury to, or causes sub
20 stantial emotional distress to that person, a member
21 of the immediate family (as defined in section 115)
22 of that person, or the spouse or intimate partner of
23 that person; or
24 ‘‘(2) with the intent—†
58
S 1197 ES
1 ‘‘(A) to kill, injure, harass, place under
2 surveillance, intimidate, or cause substantial
3 emotional distress to a person in another State
4 or tribal jurisdiction or within the special mari
5 time and territorial jurisdiction of the United
6 States; or
7 ‘‘(B) to place a person in another State or
8 tribal jurisdiction, or within the special mari
9 time and territorial jurisdiction of the United
10 States, in reasonable fear of the death of, or se
11 rious bodily injury to—
12 ‘‘(i) that person;
13 ‘‘(ii) a member of the immediate fam
14 ily (as defined in section 115 of that per
15 son; or
16 ‘‘(iii) a spouse or intimate partner of
17 that person;
18 uses the mail or any facility of interstate or foreign
19 commerce to engage in a course of conduct that
20 causes substantial emotional distress to that person
21 or places that person in reasonable fear of the death
22 of, or serious bodily injury to, any of the persons de
23 scribed in clauses (i) through (iii) of subparagraph
24 (B);
†
59
S 1197 ES
1 shall be punished as provided in section 2261(b) of this
2 title.’’.
posted by Gem_with_faraway_eyes | 9:54 AM
1 Comments:
Gem, people like this firmly believe they are above the law and won't be caught. They lack human emotions and corrupt. Period.
Ain't nothing to be done anymore but wait. Those that know the whole truth aren't affected,and do you really want to be concerned with anyone that gets off on watching someone be trashed?
You have better and happier stuff to be concerned with.
I would make sure the dog doesn't go out without you tho...people like this can and do kill innocent creatures.
Post a Comment
|<< Home